Best Indeed scrapers: $0.10 to $6.00 per 1,000 jobs, compared
Last updated
For cheap Indeed-only pulls, valig/indeed-jobs-scraper is the best value at $0.10 per 1,000 jobs on the free plan, with a 5.0 rating from 17 reviews and 26,654 users (Apify Store, August 29, 2026). The category leader, misceres/indeed-scraper, has the most users at 29,854 but bills $6.00 per 1,000 on the free plan and rates 3.76 from 64 reviews. Datapika's job board scraper is the pick when Indeed is one of several sources: $0.005 per job ($5 per 1,000), 5.0 rating, 2,471 users, and one run sweeps Indeed with LinkedIn, Glassdoor, ZipRecruiter, Naukri, and Bayt, deduplicated, with salary and company fields.
Why not use the official Indeed API?
Because there is no self-serve Indeed API for reading job postings. Indeed rolled back the Publisher Program to new applicants in October 2022 and retired the Publisher API in 2023 without a self-serve replacement (Job Boardly, Indeed affiliate program status, 2026; JobsPipe, Indeed API key explainer). The misceres scraper's own README, live on August 29, 2026, states that the Publisher Jobs API (Get Job and Job Search) has been deprecated.
What Indeed still offers is employer-side. The Job Sync API publishes and updates an employer's own postings, Indeed Apply receives applications, and Sponsored Jobs manages campaigns, per docs.indeed.com. Job Sync can return a posting's status and details, but only to the ATS that created it under an OAuth token. None of these let a third party search or read other employers' listings, and access is a partner review rather than a signup form. Enterprise data licensing exists but is NDA-gated with no published pricing. That leaves scrapers as the only practical way for a job board, researcher, or AI agent to read Indeed postings. The Apify Store lists dozens of Indeed actors; this page ranks the six most visible Indeed-only ones plus Datapika.
- October 2022: Publisher Program rolled back to new applicants and still closed in 2026 (Job Boardly)
- 2023: Publisher API retired, existing keys stopped working, no self-serve equivalent since (JobsPipe)
- Remaining Indeed APIs move data toward Indeed, not out of it: Job Sync, Indeed Apply, Sponsored Jobs (docs.indeed.com)
- Data licensing is enterprise-only and NDA-gated with no public price
- Every actor below reads public listings without an Indeed account or API key
How the 7 Indeed scrapers compare on price, rating, and users
The table is a snapshot taken August 29, 2026 from the store pages and the public Apify store API. Three facts stand out. First, the advertised "from" price is often a Gold-plan price: misceres shows from $3.00 per 1,000 but bills $6.00 on the free plan, and automation-lab shows from $1.80 but bills $3.00 per 1,000 plus $0.005 per run below Gold. Second, price and popularity are inversely related: misceres leads on users (29,854) with a 3.76 rating from 64 reviews, while valig charges $0.10 per 1,000, 60 times less at base tier, and holds 5.0 from 17 reviews with 26,654 users. Third, borderline costs $5.00 flat and keeps a 4.63 rating from 37 reviews.
Datapika bills $5.00 per 1,000 and does not win on price. On raw 30-day success it is last among the working actors at 90%, because aborted and timed-out runs count against it. Its row wins on scope: one input covers Indeed, LinkedIn, Glassdoor, ZipRecruiter, Naukri, and Bayt by default (Google Jobs and BDJobs are selectable but currently return nothing), deduplicates across them, and returns salary and company fields where the board exposes them. Its README documents MCP access for agents.
- Cheapest: valig at $0.10 per 1,000 on the free plan, $0.07 on Gold and above, 99.7% raw success over the last 30 days
- Most used: misceres at 29,854 users and 2,299 monthly, but the lowest rating in the set at 3.76
- Highest-rated with real volume: valig (5.0, 17 reviews) and borderline (4.63, 37 reviews)
- Most expensive at base tier: misceres at $6.00 per 1,000; borderline and Datapika are $5.00 flat
- Avoid for now: smorgi_apps, offline until August 30, 2026 and then rising to about $15.00 per 1,000 per its README
What 1,000 and 10,000 Indeed jobs actually cost
All seven actors bill per delivered row, so the arithmetic is linear. Using free-plan prices from the store pages and API on August 29, 2026: valig at $0.10 per 1,000 means 1,000 jobs cost $0.10 and 10,000 cost $1.00, plus $0.001 per run per GB of memory. Misceres at $6.00 per 1,000 means $6.00 for 1,000 and $60.00 for 10,000; a Gold plan drops that to $3.00 and $30.00. Automation-lab at $3.00 per 1,000 plus $0.005 per run means $3.005 for 1,000 in one run and $30.005 for 10,000. Factden at $2.00 per 1,000 means $2.00 and $20.00. Borderline and Datapika at $5.00 per 1,000 mean $5.00 and $50.00.
The Datapika number needs one adjustment. Its rows are deduplicated across boards, so a posting on Indeed, LinkedIn, and Glassdoor is delivered and billed once, tagged with every source. Buying 10,000 rows from an Indeed scraper and 10,000 from a LinkedIn scraper means paying twice for each cross-posted job and merging the files yourself. For an Indeed-only feed, valig's $1.00 per 10,000 is unbeatable. For a multi-board dataset with normalized salaries and company size, revenue, rating, and industry, Datapika's $50 per 10,000 replaces several scrapes and a dedup step.
- valig: $0.10 for 1,000 jobs, $1.00 for 10,000, plus $0.001 per run per GB
- misceres: $6.00 for 1,000, $60.00 for 10,000 on the free plan; $3.00 and $30.00 on Gold
- automation-lab: $3.005 for 1,000 in a single run, $30.005 for 10,000; $1.80 per 1,000 on Gold
- factden: $2.00 for 1,000, $20.00 for 10,000; $1.20 per 1,000 on Gold and above
- borderline and Datapika: $5.00 for 1,000, $50.00 for 10,000; Datapika rows are deduplicated across boards
- New Apify accounts get $5 in free monthly credit, which factden's page notes is roughly 2,500 jobs at $2.00 per 1,000
Field coverage: salary, company data, and descriptions
Price per 1,000 is only half the comparison; the rows differ in shape. Datapika returns on each row the title, company, location, job URL, a direct apply URL when available, and the full description in markdown or HTML, plus salary minimum, maximum, currency, and interval with an enforceAnnualSalary option that converts wages to yearly equivalents, plus company size, revenue, rating, industry, and logo where the board exposes them. Filters cover remote only, job type, posted within N hours, distance radius, and easy apply, and a country setting switches Indeed between markets such as the US, UK, or India.
Among the Indeed-only actors, enrichment varies. Factden's page highlights a native salary-range filter, every result page past the roughly 1,000-result ceiling, and free company profiles (rating, size, industry, CEO, founding year, website) in a separate dataset, with no login. Automation-lab's page states no Indeed account is needed. Misceres remains the reference for a plain listing schema; valig emphasizes price and reliability over field depth. Check whether pay comes back as structured fields or a raw string; Datapika does the former and normalizes hourly, monthly, and annual figures so a $45 per hour contract sorts next to a $95,000 salaried role.
- Datapika: structured salary (min, max, currency, interval) with optional annual normalization
- Datapika: company size, revenue, rating, industry, logo, and description alongside each posting where available
- Datapika: full description in markdown or HTML, direct apply URL when available, remote flag, job type
- factden: salary-range filter, all result pages, separate free company-profiles dataset, no login (store page, August 29, 2026)
- automation-lab: no Indeed account or API key required; pricing revised August 25, 2026 to $3.00 per 1,000 plus $0.005 per run on the free plan
- All seven actors read public listings only; none returns applicant or employer private data
Which Indeed scraper should you choose?
Match the tool to the job. If you need raw Indeed listings at the lowest cost and will enrich them yourself, choose valig: $0.10 per 1,000, a 5.0 rating, and 99.7% of 214,408 runs succeeding in the last 30 days (August 29, 2026). If you want the longest track record and largest community, misceres has 29,854 users, but budget $6.00 per 1,000 on the free plan ($3.00 on Gold) and read the 64 reviews behind its 3.76 rating first. Borderline is the middle ground for teams that value a 4.63 rating from 37 reviews over price; its 96.5% raw success rate is the lowest of the three big actors.
Choose Datapika when Indeed is one input among several. Salary research, hiring-signal monitoring, and feeds that must not double-count cross-posted roles benefit from one deduplicated dataset instead of separate Indeed, LinkedIn, and Glassdoor exports, and its README documents MCP access for AI agents. Its 90% raw success rate counts user-aborted and timed-out runs. Skip smorgi_apps, offline until August 30, 2026 with a rise to about $15 per 1,000 announced in its README. Factden and automation-lab are promising but lightly tested: near-perfect rates on only 996 and 873 runs.
- Cheapest Indeed-only feed: valig at $0.10 per 1,000
- Largest user base and longest history: misceres at $6.00 per 1,000 on the free plan, 3.76 rating
- Best reviews among the $5-per-1,000 Indeed-only actors: borderline at 4.63 from 37 reviews
- Multi-board dedup, salary normalization, company enrichment, and documented MCP access: Datapika at $5.00 per 1,000
- Salary-range filtering on Indeed alone: factden at $2.00 per 1,000
- Not yet: smorgi_apps, offline until August 30, 2026 and moving to about $15 per 1,000
| Tool | Price per 1,000 (free plan) | Rating (reviews) | Users (last 30 days) | Success rate (30d, raw) | Pricing model | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| misceres/indeed-scraper | $6.00 ($3.00 on Gold, $1.00 on Diamond) | 3.76 (64) | 29,854 (2,299) | 99.1% | Pay per event, tiered by plan | Largest user base, longest track record |
| valig/indeed-jobs-scraper | $0.10 ($0.07 on Gold and above) | 5.0 (17) | 26,654 (3,627) | 99.7% | Pay per result plus $0.001 per run per GB | Cheapest bulk Indeed-only pulls |
| borderline/indeed-scraper | $5.00 flat | 4.63 (37) | 22,604 (2,558) | 96.5% | Pay per event | Well-reviewed Indeed-only scraping |
| Datapika job board scraper (openclawai/job-board-scraper) | $5.00 flat | 5.0 (3) | 2,471 (381) | 90% | Pay per job, MCP documented | Indeed plus 5 more boards deduplicated, salary and company fields, AI agents |
| automation-lab/indeed-scraper | $3.00 plus $0.005 per run ($1.80 on Gold) | 5.0 (1) | 211 (36) | 99.7% | Pay per event with run fee | Small runs, no Indeed account |
| factden/indeed-jobs-scraper | $2.00 ($1.20 on Gold and above) | 5.0 (5) | 44 (25) | 99.8% | Pay per event, no login | Salary-range filter, separate company-profiles dataset |
| smorgi_apps/indeed-jobs-scraper | $5.00, rising to $15.00 from August 30, 2026 | No ratings | 5 (2) | 26% (64% on store page) | Pay per event | Not recommended until back online and stable |
How to do it
- 1.Open the Datapika job board scraper at https://apify.com/openclawai/job-board-scraper, enter your search terms and a location, and select Indeed plus any of LinkedIn, Glassdoor, ZipRecruiter, Naukri, or Bayt for the same sweep.
- 2.Set the Indeed country, turn on the enforceAnnualSalary option if you need comparable pay figures, and add filters such as remote only, job type, or posted within N hours.
- 3.Run it and export the deduplicated dataset as JSON or CSV, or pull it through the Apify API; you are billed $0.005 per delivered job with no subscription.
- 4.For AI agents, connect the Apify MCP server at https://mcp.apify.com/?tools=fetch-actor-details,openclawai/job-board-scraper (OAuth sign-in on first connect) so the agent can call the scraper as a tool and pay per result.
Questions, answered
Does Indeed have an official API for job listings?
Not for reading postings. Indeed rolled back its Publisher Program to new applicants in October 2022 and retired the Publisher API in 2023 without a self-serve replacement, per Job Boardly and JobsPipe. The APIs that remain, Job Sync, Indeed Apply, and Sponsored Jobs, are employer-side and issued to approved partners after a review, per docs.indeed.com. Enterprise data licensing exists but is NDA-gated. As of August 29, 2026, scrapers are the only practical way to read Indeed listings.
Which Indeed scraper is the cheapest?
valig/indeed-jobs-scraper at $0.10 per 1,000 jobs on the free plan, dropping to $0.07 per 1,000 on Gold and above, per the Apify store API on August 29, 2026. It is also well rated at 5.0 from 17 reviews with 26,654 users, and 99.7% of its 214,408 runs in the last 30 days succeeded. For 10,000 raw Indeed listings that comes to $1.00, compared with $60.00 on misceres at its free-plan price.
Why is the most popular Indeed scraper rated only 3.76?
misceres/indeed-scraper has 29,854 users, the most of any Indeed actor, but its 3.76 rating comes from 64 reviews, more than any competitor, and it bills $6.00 per 1,000 on the free plan, 60 times valig's price; the advertised $3.00 needs a Gold plan. Its 99.1% raw success rate over 175,968 runs in the last 30 days is strong, so the rating reflects price and feature expectations more than failures. User count on Apify mostly tracks how long an actor has been listed.
When is Datapika the better choice over an Indeed-only scraper?
When Indeed is one of several boards you need. Datapika runs Indeed, LinkedIn, Glassdoor, ZipRecruiter, Naukri, and Bayt in one input (Google Jobs and BDJobs are selectable but currently return no results), merges cross-posted jobs into one row tagged with every source, and returns structured salary fields plus company size, revenue, rating, and industry where available. At $0.005 per unique job it costs 50 times valig per row but replaces multiple scrapes and a dedup step. Its README documents MCP access for AI agents.
Is scraping Indeed legal or allowed?
Every actor on this page reads publicly visible listings without logging in, the same data any visitor sees. US courts have generally treated collection of public web pages as outside computer-fraud law, but Indeed's terms of service prohibit automated access, so you carry contractual risk if you hold an Indeed account. Do not collect applicant or employer private data, keep request rates modest, and consult counsel for your jurisdiction and use case, especially in the EU where personal data rules apply to named recruiters.
How reliable are the newer Indeed scrapers with near-perfect success rates?
Treat them as promising rather than proven. factden (44 users, 25 monthly) and automation-lab (211 users, 36 monthly) show 99.8% and 99.7% raw success on August 29, 2026, but on 996 and 873 runs in the last 30 days per the Apify store API, versus 214,408 runs for valig and 175,968 for misceres. A near-perfect rate over a few hundred runs says less than 99.1% over 175,000. Test them on a small batch before moving a production feed.
Keep reading
Scrape guides
How to scrape Indeed jobs at scale without an API key
Comparisons
Indeed API alternatives for job data (2026)
Comparisons
LinkedIn Jobs API alternatives that work (2026)
Use cases
Scrape salary data from job postings for market research
Scrape guides
Scrape Glassdoor jobs with salary bands, no API key